Polygon (Matic) is not a better blockchain than Ethereum because Ethereum has more futures than Polygon. and to build on Polygon, developers must use Ethereum programming tools such as Remix and Solidity. Ethereum also allows running complex applications on top of its network. However, Polygon (Matic) is a blockchain that uses the same technology as Ethereum but allows for faster transactions and less computing power requirements.
Polygon (matic) is definitely a better blockchain but not good as Ethereum. Indeed, Polygon is more secure and has a faster transaction speed. Polygon (matic) is also scalable and can be used for much larger applications than Ethereum.
Ethereum’s main advantage is that, It’s designed so that anyone can build software using smart contracts that run on the blockchain. These programs are known as decentralized applications or dApps. In fact, Ethereum has its own programming language, Solidity. Ethereum is more popular than Polygon because it was one of the first blockchains introduced to the public. However, as time has gone on, other blockchain technologies have been developed that offer many advantages over Ethereum, such as Polygon (matic).
Ethereum is a blockchain platform used to develop decentralized applications (DApps). The platform offers several services to developers, including an Ethereum virtual machine and a cryptocurrency called ether, which can be used as payment for all transactions on the network.
Why is Polygon a Better Blockchain Than Ethereum?
Now let’s talk about, Why Polygon a better blockchain than Ethereum? Polygon (Matic) is a better blockchain than Ethereum because of its architecture and consensus mechanism. Its architecture is based on sidechains that are linked to each other through a system known as Plasma Cash. This allows for transaction speeds that are almost instant and also ensures that there are no double spends.
Polygon blockchain offers many benefits over Ethereum, including faster processing times and lower costs. Polygon, formerly known as the Matic network, was founded in India in October 2017 by Jaynti Kanani, Sandeep Nailwal, and Anurag Arjun to create a better alternative to Ethereum. It has been described as being lighter and faster than Ethereum, with more features and lower costs.
Polygon (Matic) is a new blockchain platform compared to Ethereum, but Polygon has taken different approaches to solving the problems that blockchains face. Ethereum is the most popular platform for decentralized applications (Dapps) and smart contracts, but it has its own issues.
Another thing that makes Polygon (Matic) different from Ethereum is how it handles consensus. Ethereum uses Proof-of-work consensus where miners have to invest money into mining hardware to get rewarded with Ether tokens. In contrast, Polygon (Matic) uses Proof-of-stake consensus where users earn tokens based on how many tokens they hold in their wallets.
Features: Polygon is a much faster and more scalable version of Ethereum. It has been designed to handle 72000 transactions per second, making it more suitable for large-scale applications like decentralized exchanges, payment gateways, and games. The developers have also tried to address the issue of scalability by utilizing sidechains and sharding.
Consensus mechanism: While the Ethereum platform uses proof-of-work (PoW) as its consensus mechanism, Polygon utilizes an improved version of PoS called PoSv3. In this system, there are three types of nodes:
- Validators who verify transactions.
- Bakers who create blocks.
- Minters who mint new tokens after every block creation.
The consensus mechanism makes sure that at least two bakers verify all transactions before they are included in the blockchain ledger, which increases security and reduces the likelihood of double-spending attacks.
Transaction fees: The transaction fees on Polygon vary according to their size and complexity, but they are usually very low (less than $0.005). This makes it ideal for small payments.
Here Are Disadvantages Of Ethereum Blockchain:
- Never be able to be the number 1 cryptocurrency like bitcoin
- Scalability Issues
- Eth 2.0 is Causing Community Troubles
- Unstable and Outrageous Gas Fees
- Lower transection speed (Ethereum’s 15 tx/sec)
- Transaction Privacy
Read more : Pros and Cons of Ethereum Network
Blockchains’ three biggest problems are architecture, consensus, scalability, and transaction speeds. Polygon (Matic) is an improvement on Ethereum’s architecture, which means it can handle more transactions per second with less power usage than Ethereum can.
Ethereum is a great blockchain platform, but it’s not without its flaws. Polygon is a new blockchains that are trying to fix those flaws by making their platforms more affordable, faster, and scalable.
ETH VS POLYGON – Which One Should You Choose
In this video you will see the pros and cons of Polygon versus to Ethereum
Conclusion
Blockchain tech is still in its infancy and many cryptocurrencies are working to solve long-standing issues. Polygon (matic) is definitely a nest blockchain, considering current needs and limitations of other blockchain platforms. But that doesn’t mean it’s the best one. And while Ethereum has acquired some negative connotations lately, it’s still a good choice for NFT creation and exchange.
In the end, however, Ethereum is a great blockchain but we can see 3 good reasons as to why Polygon (matic) is a better blockchain than Ethereum: Secure, Speed & Cost.
We hope that this article has been somewhat helpful in pointing out why.
Explore our recent articles:
